RECOVERY HOUSE VI v. CITY OF EUGENE

LUBA No. 97-021; CA A98493.

946 P.2d 342 (1997)

150 Or. App. 382

RECOVERY HOUSE VI, Petitioner, v. CITY OF EUGENE, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 8, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. Farthing argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Gleaves Swearingen Larsen Potter Scott & Smith LLP.

Jerome Lidz argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Emily K. Newton and Harrang Long Gary Rudnick P.C.

Before HASELTON, P.J., and DEITS, C.J., and ARMSTRONG, J.


DEITS, Chief Judge.

Petitioner Recovery House VI appealed to LUBA from the City of Eugene's issuance of a conditional use permit for which petitioner had applied. LUBA held that it lacked "jurisdiction" to consider petitioner's argument that petitioner was not required to obtain a conditional use permit in order to conduct the use in question.1 Petitioner seeks review, and we reverse and remand.

Petitioner applied for the permit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases