1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 127 F.3d
  5. 127 F.3d 1157 (1997)
 

OMEGA ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. v. GILBARCO, INC.

Nos. 96-35153, 96-35172 and 96-35594.

127 F.3d 1157 (1997)

OMEGA ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., a Delaware corporation; ATS Omega, a Texas corporation; Kelley Omega, a Washington corporation; John J. Reynolds, individually; Patrick J. Reynolds, individually; Fedorico Haller, individually; Francisco Calleja, individually; Fernando Calleja, individually; William H. Kelley, individually; Michael J. Reynolds, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. GILBARCO, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellant. OMEGA ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., a Delaware corporation; ATS Omega, a Texas corporation; Kelley Omega, a Washington corporation; Plaintiffs-Appellants, and John J. Reynolds, individually; Patrick J. Reynolds, individually; Fedorico Haller, individually; Francisco Calleja, individually; Fernando Calleja, individually, William H. Kelley, individually; Michael J. Reynolds, individually, Plaintiffs, v. GILBARCO, INC., a Delaware corporation; Rochester Petroleum Equipment Company, a Minnesota corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided October 29, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David J. Burman, Perkins Coie, Seattle, Washington, for plaintiffs-appellees-cross-appellants.

Timothy J. Waters, William H. Barrett, Amy E. Hancock, Robert E. Kohn, McDermott, Will & Emery, Washington, DC, Stephen A. Kroft, McDermott, Will & Emery, Los Angeles, California, Fredric C. Tausend, Hugh F. Bangasser, Ramona M. Emerson, Preston Gates & Ellis, Seattle, Washington, for defendant-appellant-cross-appellee.

J. Thomas Richardson, Cairncross & Hempelmann, Seattle, Washington, for defendant-cross-appellee.

Before: WRIGHT, PREGERSON and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge WRIGHT; Dissent by Judge PREGERSON.

EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge.

In this complex antitrust case we must decide, among other issues, whether the district court erred in submitting to the jury the plaintiffs' Clayton Act § 3 exclusive dealing and other state law claims.

I

Background

Manufacturers of petroleum dispensing equipment1 sell their products, both directly and through...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases