1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 963 F.Supp.
  5. 963 F.Supp. 318 (1997)
 

HORN'S, INC. v. SANOFI BEAUTE, INC.

No. 95 Civil 2994 (RJW).

963 F.Supp. 318 (1997)

HORN'S, INC., Plaintiff, v. SANOFI BEAUTE, INC. and Nina Ricci, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

May 9, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nims, Howes, Collison, Hansen & Lackert, New York City (Oliver P. Howes, Jr., Robert L. Powley, of counsel), for Plaintiff.

Curtis, Morris & Safford, P.C., New York City (Gregor N. Neff, William S. Frommer, Marilyn M. Brogan, Daniel G. Brown, of counsel) for Defendants.

OPINION

ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.

Defendants Sanofi Beaute, Inc. and Nina Ricci, Inc. move pursuant to Rule 56, Fed. R.Civ.P., for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, defendants' motion is granted.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Horn's Inc. ("Horn's"), a Connecticut corporation with its principal place of business in New York City, commenced this action against Sanofi Beaute, Inc. and Nina Ricci, Inc., alleging trademark infringement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases