VALMET PAPER MACHINERY, INC., & Valmet, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
BELOIT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 1, 1997.
May 1, 1997.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Myron Cohen, Cohen, Pontani, Lieberman & Pavane, New York City, submitted a response for plaintiffs-appellants to a petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc. With him on the petition were William A. Alper and Michael C. Stuart. Of counsel on the response were Michael Evan Jaffe, Arent, Fox, Kintner, Plotkin & Kahn, Washington, D.C., and Brian E. Butler, Stafford, Rosenbaum, Rieser & Hansen, Madison, WI.
George P. McAndrews, McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd., Chicago, IL, submitted a petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc for defendant-appellee. With him on the petition were Steven J. Hampton, Gregory C. Schodde, and Michael B. Harlin.
Before RICH, LOURIE, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
ORDER
RICH, Circuit Judge.
Beloit Corp. petitions for rehearing of our decision of January 28, 1997 holding that its U.S. Patents 5,144,758 and 5,249,372 are invalid on the ground of obviousness. Valmet Paper Mach., Inc. v. Beloit Corp.,105 F.3d 1409 (Fed.Cir.1997). Beloit argues, inter alia, that only certain claims of those patents were asserted and that, accordingly, invalidation of the entire patents...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.