1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 950 P.2d
  5. 950 P.2d 328 (1997)
 

STANICH v. PRECISION BODY AND PAINT, INC.

C950261CV; CA A93401.

950 P.2d 328 (1997)

151 Or. App. 446

Debra R. STANICH, Appellant, v. PRECISION BODY AND PAINT, INC., an Oregon corporation; and Maurice Monroe, an individual, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 26, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig A. Crispin, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Steven T. Conklin and Crispin & Associates.

Jeffrey M. Batchelor, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Paula A. Barran and Lane Powell Spears Lubersky, Portland.

Before RIGGS, P.J., and LANDAU and LEESON, JJ.

LEESON, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court granted defendants' motion for directed verdict on plaintiff's retaliatory discharge claims. ORS 659.410. Plaintiff also appeals from the trial court's granting of defendants' motion for summary judgment on her penalty wage claim, ORS 652.150, and from an award of attorney fees to defendants. ORS 659.121(1). We review for errors of law, ORS 19.125(1), and reverse and remand.

On...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases