1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 112 F.3d
  5. 112 F.3d 1163 (1997)
 

ROBOTIC VISION SYSTEMS v. VIEW ENGINEERING INC.

No. 96-1365.

112 F.3d 1163 (1997)

ROBOTIC VISION SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIEW ENGINEERING, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 1, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert D. Fier, Kenyon & Kenyon, New York City, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Edward J. Handler, III, Donna M. Praiss, and John R. Witcher, III.

Ernie L. Brooks, Brooks & Kushman, P.C., Southfield, Michigan, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Frank A. Angileri.

Before LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and RADER, Circuit Judges.

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Robotic Vision Systems, Inc. appeals from the summary judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California holding that U.S. Patent 5,463,227 is invalid on the grounds of failure to disclose the best mode of carrying out the invention and violation of the on-sale bar. Robotic Vision Sys., Inc. v. View Eng'g, Inc., No. 95-CV-7441, 1996 WL 383900 (C.D.Cal. Mar. 5, 1996). Because the district court erred in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases