U.S. DEPT. OF ENERGY v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS

Nos. 95-2949, 95-3113.

106 F.3d 1158 (1997)

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, Morgantown Energy Technology Center, Morgantown, West Virginia, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent, American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1995, AFL-CIO, Intervenor. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, Morgantown Energy Technology Center, Morgantown, West Virginia, Respondents.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided February 13, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: William Kanter, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. David Michael Smith, Solicitor, Federal Labor Relations Authority, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Kevin Michael Grile, Assistant General Counsel, American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Chicago, IL, for Intervenor. ON BRIEF: Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, John F. Daly, Ellen D. Katz, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. James F. Blandford, Federal Labor Relations Authority, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Mark D. Roth, General Counsel, Charles A. Hobbie, Deputy General Counsel, American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Washington, D.C., for Intervenor.

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


Enforcement denied by published opinion. Judge WILKINS wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge WILLIAMS joined. Judge LUTTIG wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment.

OPINION

WILKINS, Circuit Judge:

The United States Department of Energy (the Department) petitions for review of a decision and order of the Federal Labor Relations Authority (the Authority) that concluded that the Department violated the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases