1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 969 F.Supp.
  5. 969 F.Supp. 289 (1997)
 

HYDE ATHLETIC INDUSTRIES, INC. v. CONTINENTAL CAS. CO.

Civil Action No. 95-5822.

969 F.Supp. 289 (1997)

HYDE ATHLETIC INDUSTRIES, INC., and Saucony Shoe Manufacturing Company, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Continental Insurance Company, Greater New York Mutual Insurance Company, Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company, Federal Insurance Company, and Highlands Insurance Company, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

June 16, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul W. Kisslinger, Anderson, Kill, Olick & Oshinsky, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, Catherine C. Pyune, Obermayer, Rebmann, Maxwell and Hippel, Philadelphia, PA, Eugene R. Anderson, Steven J. Dolmanisth, Anderson, Kill and Olick and Oshinsky, P.C., New York City, Clare Marie Diemer, Joseph J. McGovern, Obermayer, Rebmann, Maxwell & Hippel, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiffs.

James E. Brown, Thomas G. Wilkinson, Jr., Cozen & O'Connor, Philadelphia, PA, for Continental Cas. Co. and Continental Ins. Co.

Thomas Paschos, John Gerard Devlin, John Gerard Devlin & Assoc. Philadelphia, PA, for Greater New York Mutual Insurance Company.

Joseph P. Sullivan, Joseph P. Klein, Law Office of Joseph P. Sullivan, Philadelphia, PA, Susan K.B. Urbas, Michael W. Morrison, Tressler, Soderstrom, Maloney & Priess, Chicago, IL, Lawrence A. Monte, Law Office of Joseph P. Sullivan, Philadelphia, PA, for Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company.

James B. Burns, Deasey, Mahoney & Bender, Ltd., Philadelphia, PA, for Federal Ins. Co.

Mitchell S. Pinsly, Philadelphia, PA, Marjorie H. Mintzer, Ellen G. Margolis, Sheft and Sheft, New York City, for Highlands Ins. Co.

MEMORANDUM

CAHN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs Hyde Athletic Industries, Inc. ("Hyde") and Saucony Shoe Manufacturing Company, Inc. ("Saucony") have sued several of their insurance carriers, seeking, inter alia, the costs of defense and indemnity related to an environmental action. Before the court are Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment against one of their insurers for breach of the duty to defend, and motions by three of the insurers for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases