IN RE HAYES

No. 96-526.

79 Ohio St.3d 46 (1997)

IN RE HAYES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 18, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert A. Fry, Hancock County Prosecuting Attorney, and Jonathan P. Starn, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

Brimley & Kostyo and John C. Filkins, for appellee.


FRANCIS E. SWEENEY, SR., J.

This case concerns the interpretation of the six-month waiting period imposed by former R.C. 2151.413(A) on a children services agency seeking permanent custody of a child. Based on the intent of the legislation, we hold that former R.C. 2151.413(A) required that a children services agency seeking permanent custody of a child must have had temporary custody of the child for at least six months immediately preceding the filing of the motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases