1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 992 F.Supp.
  5. 992 F.Supp. 259 (1997)
 

JOYCE v. CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP.

No. 89-CV-1599C.

992 F.Supp. 259 (1997)

Charles A. JOYCE, Joseph C. Matesic, Richard A. Samer and Vernon P. Taylor, for themselves and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. New York.

December 30, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Joseph Giroux, Jr., Buffalo, NY, for Plaintiff.

O'Melveny & Meyers LLP (Robert N. Eccles, of Counsel), Washington, DC, for Defendant.

DECISION and ORDER

CURTIN, District Judge.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs commenced this class action against Curtiss-Wright Corporation ("Curtiss-Wright") in December 1989 under section 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 1132 ("ERISA") and Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185 ("LMRA"). Plaintiffs are a class of retired Curtiss-Wright employees who were represented...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases