1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 979 F.Supp.
  5. 979 F.Supp. 257 (1997)
 

FREEMAN v. COMPLEX COMPUTING CO., INC.

No. 95 Civ. 3811(LAK).

979 F.Supp. 257 (1997)

Daniel FREEMAN, Plaintiff, v. COMPLEX COMPUTING COMPANY, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

October 14, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barbara E. Olk, Trief & Olk, New York City, for plaintiff.

Richard B. Cohen, Akabas & Cohen, New York City, for defendants Complex Computing Co., Inc. and Jason Glazier.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KAPLAN, District Judge.

The principal issue presented by this case is whether the corporate veil of an entity known as Complex Computing Co., Inc. ("C3") may be pierced to require Jason Glazier, C3's equitable owner, to arbitrate the plaintiff's claim against him. This Court previously held that it may and directed Glazier to arbitrate.1 The Court of Appeals, although largely affirming the previous decision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases