DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. CHASE MANHATTAN

No. 95-TX-1599.

689 A.2d 539 (1997)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellant, v. The CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided January 30, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lutz Alexander Prager, Assistant Deputy Corporation Counsel, with whom Charles F.C. Ruff, Corporation Counsel, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corporation Counsel, were on the brief, for appellant.

John J. McAvoy, with whom Anne D. Smith and Ellen S. Moore were on the brief, Washington, for appellee.

Before FERREN, FARRELL and REID, Associate Judges.


FERREN, Associate Judge:

This case presents an issue of first impression in this court: can the District of Columbia, consistent with the Due Process Clause, tax the annual net income of a testamentary trust created by the will of an individual who died while domiciled in the District, when the trustee, trust assets, and trust beneficiaries are all presently located outside the District. We hold that the Due Process Clause does not prevent the District from imposing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases