CITY OF SEATTLE v. NORBY

Nos. 37074-0-I, 40467-9-I.

945 P.2d 269 (1997)

88 Wash.App. 545

CITY OF SEATTLE, Respondent, v. Timothy NORBY, Appellant. CITY OF SEATTLE, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. Roy V. BURDGE, Respondent/Cross-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

October 20, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dmitri Iglitzen, Catherine Ann Chaney of The Defender Association, Seattle, for Appellant Timothy Norby.

Richard E. Greene, Asst. City Attorney, Criminal Division, Seattle, for Appellant/Cross-Respondent City of Seattle.

Margaret M. Boyle, Richard E. Greene, Asst. City Attorneys, Criminal Division, Seattle, for Respondent City of Seattle.

Catherine Ann Chaney of The Defender Association, Seattle, for Respondent/Cross-Appellant Roy V. Burdge.


WEBSTER, Judge.

Timothy Norby and Roy Burdge were each convicted by a jury of Driving While Intoxicated. In the wake of State v. Crediford, 130 Wn.2d 747, 927 P.2d 1129 (1996), they challenge the jury instructions and criminal complaint, arguing that the instructions and complaint omitted Crediford`s "implied element." In addition, Norby argues...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases