INA WALZLAGER SCHAEFFLER KG and INA Bearing Company, Inc.; FAG Kugelfischer Georg Schäfer AG and FAG Bearings Corporation; SKF USA Inc. and SKF GmbH, Plaintiffs and Defendant-Intervenors,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant,
The Torrington Company, Defendant-Intervenor and Plaintiff,
NTN Bearing Corporation of America and NTN Kugellagerfabrik (Deutschland): GmbH, Defendant-Intervenors.
United States Court of International Trade.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 3, 1997.
February 3, 1997.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Arent Fox Kintner Plotkin & Kahn, Washington, DC (Stephen L. Gibson and Peter L. Sultan), for plaintiff and defendant-intervenor INA.
Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz & Silverman, L.L.P., New York City (Max F. Schutzman, Andrew B. Schroth and Mark E. Pardo), for plaintiff and defendant-intervenor FAG.
Howrey & Simon, Washington, DC (Herbert C. Shelley, Alice A. Kipel, Anne Talbot and Patricia M. Steele), for plaintiff and defendant-intervenor SKF.
Stewart and Stewart, Washington, DC (Terence P. Stewart, Wesley K. Caine, William A. Fennell, Geert De Prest and Lane S. Hurewitz), for plaintiff and defendant-intervenor Torrington.
Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, Chicago, IL (Donald J. Unger and Kazumune V. Kano), for defendant-intervenor NTN Bearing Corporation of America and NTN Kugellagerfabrik (Deutschland) GmbH.
Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General; David M. Cohen, Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice (Velta A. Melnbrencis); of counsel: Mark A. Barnett, Michelle K. Behaylo, Stacy J. Ettinger, Thomas H. Fine, Dean A. Pinkert and David J. Ross, Attorney-Advisors, Office of the Chief Counsel for Import Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, for defendant.
United States Court of International Trade.
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge:
Plaintiffs and defendant-intervenors INA Walzlager Schaeffler KG and INA Bearing Company, Inc. (collectively "INA"), FAG Kugelfischer Georg Schäfer AG and FAG Bearings Corporation (collectively "FAG"), and SKF USA Inc. and SKF GmbH (collectively "SKF") move this Court pursuant to Rule 56.2 of the Rules of this Court challenging certain aspects of the final determination of the fourth administrative review of antifriction...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
