1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 129 F.3d
  5. 129 F.3d 1069 (1997)
 

U.S. v. HOCKINGS

No. 97-50018.

129 F.3d 1069 (1997)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Stuart HOCKINGS, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided November 21, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard D. Burda, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, California, for defendant-appellant.

David C. Scheper, and Benjamin Jones, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Los Angeles, California, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before: CANBY and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and MOLLOY, District Judge.

MOLLOY, District Judge:

I. Overview

Mark Stuart Hockings ("Hockings") was charged with one count of possessing eight computer files containing visual depictions of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B), and one count of transporting sixteen visual depictions of child pornography in interstate commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(1). After a bench trial he was found guilty on both counts.

On appeal, he claims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases