DAMIANO v. EXIDE CORP.

No. 92 Civ. 1395(LBS).

970 F.Supp. 222 (1997)

Richard DAMIANO, Plaintiff, v. EXIDE CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

June 24, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert T. Wolf, Bronx, NY, Pryor, Cashman, Sherman & Flynn, New York City (Joseph Z. Epstein, of counsel), for Plaintiff.

Ahmuty, Demers & McManus, Albertson, NY (Edward G. Lukoski, of counsel), for Defendant.


OPINION & ORDER

SAND, District Judge.

The matter before the Court entails conflicting views concerning how N.Y.C.P.L.R. Article 50-B should be applied to determine the sum of money ultimately to be paid to a plaintiff for future damages, an issue which has divided the lower courts and has not yet been definitively resolved by the New York Court of Appeals.

Plaintiff Richard Damiano ("Damiano") moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases