1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 943 P.2d
  5. 943 P.2d 247 (1997)
 

PROMAX DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. MATTSON

No. 960684-CA.

943 P.2d 247 (1997)

PROMAX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Appellant, and Cross-appellee, v. Matt MATTSON and Sherie Mattson, Defendants, Appellees, and Cross-appellants.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

July 25, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rex E. Madsen, Korey D. Rasmussen, and David L. Pinkston, Snow, Christensen & Martineau, Salt Lake City, for Appellant.

Steven C. Russell, G. Brent Smith, and Curt W. Morris, Affordable Legal Advocates, Salt Lake City, for Appellees.

Before WILKINS, Associate P.J., and GREENWOOD and JACKSON, JJ.

OPINION

GREENWOOD, Judge:

Appellant ProMax Development Corp. (ProMax) challenges the trial court's judgment in favor of appellees Matt and Sherie Mattson, arguing that (1) the evidence presented at the bench trial does not support the trial court's finding of intentional interference with contractual relations; (2) the trial court erred in not considering newly discovered evidence, which indicates that ProMax should not be held liable for intentional interference...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases