1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 956 F.Supp.
  5. 956 F.Supp. 230 (1997)
 

DESHAIS v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP.

93-CV-1223.

956 F.Supp. 230 (1997)

Armand P. DESHAIS and Karl H. Stieg, Plaintiffs, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. New York.

February 26, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Office of Benjamin T. Garry, Albany, NY, for Plaintiffs; Benjamin T. Garry, of counsel.

Hodgson, Russ, Andrews, Woods & Goodyear, Buffalo, NY, for Defendant; Robert B. Conklin, Adam W. Perry, of counsel.

MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER

McAVOY, Chief Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Armand Deshais and Karl Stieg allege that they were discriminated against on the basis of their age by defendant Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail"). Plaintiffs also allege that Conrail committed fraud by submitting falsified documents and providing inaccurate information to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") in connection with the EEOC...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases