1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 112 F.3d
  5. 112 F.3d 1068 (1997)
 

LINDSAY v. THIOKOL CORP.

No. 96-4033.

112 F.3d 1068 (1997)

Grant T. LINDSAY, F. Bruce Stevens, Russell M. Rasmussen, Thomas C. Labau, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. THIOKOL CORPORATION and Thiokol Corporation Pension Plan, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

April 18, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonah Orlofsky of Plotkin & Lacobs, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Mary Anne Q. Wood of Wood, Quinn & Crapo, L.C., Salt Lake City, Utah, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before HENRY, MURPHY, and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge.

Thiokol Corporation amended its pension plan to change the definition of "normal retirement age" from the age of 65 to 67. Several former employees, who took early retirement and who would be receiving greater benefits had the plan not been changed, sued under ERISA, claiming a violation of four separate provisions of the Act. The district court entered summary judgment for Thiokol on the ground that Thiokol's amended plan satisfied ERISA...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases