BELL ATLANTIC TELEPHONE COMPANIES v. F.C.C.

No. 97-1432.

131 F.3d 1044 (1997)

BELL ATLANTIC TELEPHONE COMPANIES, et al., Petitioners, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents, AT&T Corporation, et al., Intervenors.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided December 23, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark L. Evans argued the cause for petitioners, with whom Michael K. Kellogg, Washington, DC, Sean A. Lev, Washington, DC, James R. Young, Michael E. Glover, Arlington, VA, and Edward Shakin, Arlington, VA, were on the briefs.

John E. Ingle, Washington, DC, Deputy Associate General Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, argued the cause for respondents, with whom Joel I. Klein, Washington, DC, Acting Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, William E. Kennard, General Counsel at the time the brief was filed, Federal Communications Commission, Christopher J. Wright, Spokane, WA, Deputy General Counsel at the time the brief was filed, Laurel R. Bergold, Washington, DC, Counsel, Catherine G. O'Sullivan, Washington, DC and Nancy C. Garrison, Washington, DC, Attorneys, U.S. Department of Justice, were on the brief.

Anthony C. Epstein, Washington, DC, argued the cause for intervenors MCI Tele-communications Corporation, et al., with whom Mark C. Rosenblum, Basking Ridge, NJ, David W. Carpenter, Peter D. Keisler, Washington, DC, Leon M. Kestenbaum, Washington, DC, Charles C. Hunter, Catherine M. Hannan, Bowie, MD, and Richard S. Whitt were on the brief. Jay C. Keithley, Washington, DC, entered an appearance.

James D. Ellis, Robert M. Lynch, Patricia Diaz Dennis, San Antonio, TX, David F. Brown, Randall E. Cape, San Francisco, CA, Patricia L.C. Mahoney, San Francisco, CA, Martin E. Grambow, Washington, DC, Durward D. Dupre, St. Louis, MO, and Mary W. Marks were on the statement in lieu of brief, filed on behalf of intervenors SBC Communications Inc., et al.

Before: EDWARDS, Chief Judge, TATEL, Circuit Judge and BUCKLEY, Senior Circuit Judge.


Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge EDWARDS.

EDWARDS, Chief Judge:

This case arises from a challenge to an Order of the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission") construing a poorly drafted section of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, enacted as 47 U.S.C. § 272. Under the statute, there are two potentially contradictory edicts: first, § 272(a) states that, normally, a Bell Operating Company ("BOC") may not provide origination of most...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases