NEW WINCHESTER v. FRANKLIN CTY. BD. OF REVISION

No. 96-1755.

80 Ohio St.3d 36 (1997)

NEW WINCHESTER GARDENS LTD., APPELLANT, v. FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided October 8, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Todd W. Sleggs, for appellant.

Ronald J. O'Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, James R. Gorry and Matthew Chafin, Assistant County Prosecutors, for appellees Franklin County Board of Revision and Franklin County Auditor.

Teaford, Rich & Wheeler and Jeffrey A. Rich, for appellee Groveport Madison Local Schools Board of Education.


Per Curiam.

New Winchester's first argument is that the BTA erred in its application of the doctrine of res judicata to preclude certain evidence in this matter. We disagree.

The relevant portion of the BTA decision states:

"This Board and the Court of Appeals, based upon the probative evidence and record before them determined that the 1984 sale constituted an arm's-length sale, and that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases