Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to plaintiffs in accordance with the following Memorandum: In appeal No. 1, plaintiffs challenge an order granting the motion of fourth-party defendant Frank L. Ciminelli Construction Co., Inc. (Ciminelli), to preclude the testimony of an economist for plaintiffs' failure to comply with a scheduling order requiring all parties to complete expert disclosure in accordance with CPLR 3101 (d)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ROOK v. 60 KEY CTR., INC.
239 A.D.2d 926 (1997)
660 N.Y.S.2d 238
Robert L. Rook et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. 60 Key Centre, Inc., et al., Respondents. 60 Key Centre, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Aluma Systems Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. Burke Company, Fourth-Party Plaintiff, v. Frank L. Ciminelli Construction Co., Inc., Fourth-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant. Mobile Materials Handling Equipment, Ltd., Fourth-Party Plaintiff, v. Frank L. Ciminelli Construction Co., Inc., Fourth-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant, and Aluma Systems Corporation et al., Fourth-Party Defendants-Respondents. (Appeal No. 1.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 30, 1997
May 30, 1997
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
