Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
On appeal from a judgment convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]), defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in refusing to grant his request for a missing witness charge. We disagree. Defendant failed to make the requisite prima facie showing that the missing witness was in the control of the prosecution and could be expected to testify favorably...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.