LYTLE v. MALADY

Docket No. 102515, Calendar No. 16.

566 N.W.2d 582 (1997)

Nancy LYTLE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael MALADY and Howmet Corporation, Defendants-Appellants.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided July 31, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bott & Spencer, P.C. by Timothy J. Bott, Muskegon, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Varnum, Riddering, Schmidt & Howlett by Joseph J. Vogan and Paul M. Kara, Grand Rapids, for Defendants-Appellants.


Opinion

RILEY, Justice.

In the matter now before us, this Court is asked to clarify the evidentiary threshold a discharged employee must satisfy in order to create a genuine issue of material fact when an employer asserts that its decision to discharge an employee was precipitated by business conditions. We are also asked to decide whether a discharged employee may challenge an employer's decision to reduce...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases