DIEZ v. MINNESOTA MIN. & MFG.

No. C5-97-83.

564 N.W.2d 575 (1997)

Donald E. DIEZ, Appellant, v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied August 21, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard T. Wylie, Dee Rowe, Minneapolis, for Appellant.

Thomas P. Kane, Kathleen M. Mahoney, David M. Wilk, Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly, St. Paul, for Respondent.

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, P.J., and RANDALL and SCHUMACHER, JJ.


OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

In this age discrimination case, appellant Donald E. Diez challenges the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing (3M), arguing there are genuine issues of material fact. We affirm.

FACTS

Diez worked for 3M from 1962 until August 1, 1992, when he retired at age 58 from 3M's Tape Group as part of a voluntary severance plan. Diez's salary grade had been reduced...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases