U.S. v. MORALES

No. 94-10507.

108 F.3d 1031 (1997)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gloria Ann MORALES, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided March 5, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Larry Kupers, Assistant Federal Public Defender, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellant.

Stephen H. Jigger, Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before: HUG, Chief Judge, and BROWNING, SNEED, FLETCHER, REINHARDT, HALL, NOONAN, THOMPSON, FERNANDEZ, RYMER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.


DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:

Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b) precludes an expert, testifying as to the mental state or condition of a defendant, from stating "an opinion or inference as to whether the defendant did or did not have the mental state or condition constituting an element of the crime charged or of a defense thereto." Fed. R.Evid. 704(b). There is a conflict in our circuit concerning the admissibility of expert testimony under this rule when an expert...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases