1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 53 Cal.App.4th
  5. 53 Cal.App.4th 1084 (1997)
 

THOMAS v. CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO

Docket No. A073656.

53 Cal.App.4th 1084 (1997)

CLAUDY J. THOMAS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

March 26, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Tanke & Willemsen and Tony J. Tanke for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Berkeley, Carter, Thompson & Lawson, Michael Lawson, Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin, Peter J. Busch, Daniel E. Caul and L. Jay Kuo for Defendant and Appellant.

Goldfarb & Lipman and Richard A. Judd as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant.

OPINION

PETERSON, P.J.

In this appeal, we conclude the trial court correctly ruled that the City of East Palo Alto (the City) had unconstitutionally imposed and collected a property tax not apportioned according to value, as is required by article XIII, section 1 of the California Constitution (section 1).

In City of Oakland v. Digre (1988) 205 Cal.App.3d 99, 102-103...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases