CURRAN v. ODOT

94-4550-E-3; CA A93098.

951 P.2d 183 (1997)

151 Or. App. 781

James C. CURRAN and Mary J. Curran, husband and wife, individually and as Trustees for the James and Mary Curran Trust Dated November 23, 1992, Appellants, v. STATE of Oregon By and Through its DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 24, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William A. Mansfield, Medford, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellants.

Stephanie L. Striffler, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and ARMSTRONG, JJ.


ARMSTRONG, Judge.

Plaintiffs brought an action against the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) for inverse condemnation, based on a contention that ODOT had deprived them of all reasonable vehicular access from a state highway to a parcel of real property that abuts the highway. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment that granted summary judgment in favor of ODOT in the action. In conducting our review of the summary judgment, we view the evidence and all reasonable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases