SWANSON v. ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP

Docket No. CUM-96-305.

692 A.2d 441 (1997)

1997 ME 63

Albert SWANSON, et al. v. The ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF PORTLAND, et al.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided April 4, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas S. Carr, Peter S. Carlisle, Perkins, Thompson, Hinckley & Keddy, Portland, for Albert Swanson.

Judy R. Potter, Cape Elizabeth, for Ruth Swanson.

Frederick C. Moore, Thomas R. Kelly, Robinson, Kriger & McCallum, Portland, for Roman Catholic Bishop.

Peter DeTroy, Terry Fralich, Norman, Hanson & Detroy, Portland, for Fr. Maurice Morin.

Before: WATHEN, C.J., ROBERTS, CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA, and LIPEZ, JJ.


WATHEN, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] For the first time, we must decide whether courts may constitutionally impose and enforce a duty of employee supervision derived from secular agency principles against a religious organization. The issue is presented on the report of the interlocutory order of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Saufley, J.) declining to dismiss Albert and Ruth Swanson's claim against the Roman...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases