Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Supreme Court did not err in permitting the People to introduce testimony of defendant from a prior trial as part of their case-in-chief. The People were not required to satisfy the requirements of CPL 670.10. The evidence included admissions by defendant and was independently admissible under that exception to the hearsay rule (see, People v Rose,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.