RUSNAK v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF BRIDGEPORT

No. 3:94-CV-1131 (EBB).

963 F.Supp. 161 (1997)

Raymond RUSNAK, Plaintiff, v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BRIDGEPORT, Clarence Craig and Olive Harbor, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

May 13, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas E. Mangines, Brian A. Mangines, Mangines & Mangines, Fairfield, CT, for plaintiff.

Joseph A. Siciliano, Stratford, CT, Thomas W. Bucci, Heidi C. Clark, Willinger, Shepro, Tower & Bucci, Bridgeport, CT, for defendants.


RULING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A NEW TRIAL

ELLEN B. BURNS, Senior District Judge.

On May 24, 1996, a jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff Raymond Rusnak on his claims of age discrimination and breach of an implied employment contract. Defendant Bridgeport Housing Authority has moved for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, for a new trial. For the following...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases