SCHULTZ v. SPRINGFIELD FOREST PRODUCTS

WCB 94-07903; CA A91008.

951 P.2d 169 (1997)

151 Or. App. 727

In the Matter of the Compensation of Gregory D. Schultz, Claimant. Gregory D. SCHULTZ, Petitioner, v. SPRINGFIELD FOREST PRODUCTS and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 24, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dale C. Johnson, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief Malagon, Moore, Johnson & Jensen.

Steven R. Cotton, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief, for respondents.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and ARMSTRONG, JJ.


WARREN, Presiding Judge.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Worker's Compensation Board modifying an order of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) increasing claimant's unscheduled permanent partial disability (PPD) award. The issues are whether the Board or the ALJ may invalidate a rule of the director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services, and, if so, whether OAR 436-35-320(5) is a valid exercise of the director's rule-making authority. We affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases