Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion for summary judgment but erred in granting plaintiffs' cross motion for summary judgment. "On a motion for summary judgment, the court should accept as true the evidence submitted by the opposing party and any evidence of the movant which favors the opposing party" (O'Sullivan v Presbyterian Hosp.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
BUNK v. BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF UTICA-WATERTOWN, INC.
244 A.D.2d 862 (1997)
668 N.Y.S.2d 121
George Bunk et al., Respondents, v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Utica-Watertown, Inc., Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 19, 1997
November 19, 1997
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
