1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 54 Cal.App.4th
  5. 54 Cal.App.4th 1048 (1997)
 

RIVERO v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. A075959.

54 Cal.App.4th 1048 (1997)

FRANCISCO JOSE RIVERO, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; ARLO SMITH as District Attorney, etc., et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

April 30, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Randall B. Aiman-Smith for Petitioner.

Thomas R. Burke, Davis Wright Tremaine and Elizabeth Pritzker as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Louise H. Renne, City Attorney, Patrick J. Mahoney and Hajime Tada, Deputy City Attorneys, for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

CORRIGAN, J.

Here we hold that neither the California Public Records Act (CPRA) (Gov. Code, § 6250 et seq.)1 nor the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance (Ordinance) (S.F. Admin. Code, ch. 67) compels disclosure of district attorney criminal investigation files. Section 25303 prevents a county board of supervisors from obstructing the investigatory and prosecutorial

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases