HIGGINBOTHAM v. KING

Docket No. B099406.

54 Cal.App.4th 1040 (1997)

ROBERT W. HIGGINBOTHAM, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. PAUL KING et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.

April 14, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

George, Gallo & Sullivan, Ray A. Gallo and Shaunna Sullivan for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Margaret A. Rodda, Assistant Attorney General, Richard J. Rojo and Jung D. Shin, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

YEGAN, J.

Robert W. Higginbotham appeals from a judgment dismissing his civil rights complaint (42 U.S.C. § 1983) after the trial court ruled that it failed to state a cause of action. We affirm. Appellant has failed to demonstrate that the complaint can be amended to allege a cognizable damage. (WMX Technologies, Inc. v. Miller (9th Cir.1996) 80 F.3d 1315, 1319-1320.)

Facts

On September...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases