CITY OF ST. PAUL v. AFSCME COUNCIL 14

No. C7-97-134.

567 N.W.2d 524 (1997)

In the Matter of the Arbitration between the CITY OF SAINT PAUL, petitioner, Respondent, v. AFSCME COUNCIL 14, LOCAL 2508, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

July 31, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peg Birk, Saint Paul City Attorney, John B. McCormick, Deputy City Attorney, St. Paul, for respondent.

Gregg M. Corwin, Karin E. Peterson, Gregg M. Corwin & Associates, St. Louis Park, for appellants.

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, P.J., and RANDALL and SCHUMACHER, JJ.


OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Appellants AFSCME Council 14, Local 2508, and Local 1852 (AFSCME) challenge the district court's order vacating an arbitration award in which the arbitrator concluded that AFSCME may not, pursuant to city ordinance, impose a residency requirement. We reverse.

FACTS

AFSCME serves as the exclusive representative of certain classified employees of respondent City of Saint Paul (the City). Pursuant to Minnesota's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases