VIVID TECHNOLOGIES INC. v. AMERICAN SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, INC.

No. Civ.A. 96-11059-REK.

997 F.Supp. 93 (1997)

VIVID TECHNOLOGIES INC., Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

July 10, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth R. Berman, Sherin & Lodgen, Boston, MA, Ivan S. Kavrukov, Wendy E. Miller, Victor DeVito, Cooper & Dunham LLP, New York City, for Plaintiff.

Gary R. Greenberg, Donnalyn B. Lynch Kahn, Goldstein & Manello, P.C., Boston, MA, Robert L. Kann, Bromberg & Sunstein, Boston, MA, for Defendant.

Kenneth R. Berman, Sherin & Lodgen, Boston, MA, for Vivid Technologies Incorporated, Counter-Defendant.


Memorandum and Interlocutory Order Construing Claims 5 and 8 of the '283 Patent

KEETON, District Judge.

In this action, the plaintiff, Vivid Technologies ("Vivid"), seeks a declaratory judgment that it does not infringe patent No. 5,253,283, ("'283 patent"), held by American Science & Engineering, Inc., or, in the alternative, that the '283 patent is invalid. It is AS & E's position that Vivid makes, uses, or sells a system that reads, element for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases