1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 953 F.Supp.
  5. 953 F.Supp. 134 (1997)
 

BLACK & DECKER (US) v. CATALINA LIGHTING

No. 1:96CV1577.

953 F.Supp. 134 (1997)

BLACK & DECKER (US) INC., Black & Decker Inc., Plaintiffs, v. CATALINA LIGHTING, INC., Westinghouse Electric Corp., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division.

February 28, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Amy S. Owen, Miles & Stockbridge, McLean, VA, Raymond P. Niro, John C. Janka, Raymond P. Niro, Jr., Christopher J. Lee, David J. Sheikh, Niro, Scavone, Haller and Niro, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs.

Terence P. Ross, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, L.L.P., Washington, DC, V. Bryan Medlock, Jr., William O. Fifield, Charles S. Cotropia, Sidley & Austin, Dallas, TX, David T. Pritikin, Thomas D. Rein, Sidley & Austin, Chicago, IL, for Catalina.

Jonathan D. Schiller, Jason Shrinsky, Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays & Handler, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Westinghouse.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

In this patent infringement action, Black & Decker,1 the owner of United States Patent No. 5,567,115 (the "115 patent"), sues Catalina Lighting, Inc. ("Catalina") for direct infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) and Westinghouse Electric Corp. ("Westinghouse") for inducing Catalina's infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b).2 More specifically...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases