Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
We reject the contention of defendant that Supreme Court erred in denying his motion to sever those counts in the indictment charging him with three separate sexual assaults. The offenses were joinable because the identity of defendant was at issue and his modus operandi was "sufficiently unique to make proof of his commission of one [assault] probative of his commission of the other[s]" (People v Nix,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.