INLINE PLASTICS CORP. v. TENNECO PACKING CORP.

Civil No. 3:95cv00200(AVC).

979 F.Supp. 79 (1997)

INLINE PLASTICS CORP., Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. TENNECO PACKING CORP., Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

February 20, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles D. Ray, Cummings & Lockwood, Hartford, CT, Barry Kramer, Allen D. Brufsky, Rosanne C. Baxter, Cummings & Lockwood, Stamford, CT, Kevin M. Mason, Ryan & Mason, Fairfield, CT, for Inline Plastics Corp.

Paul D. Sanson, Shipman & Goodwin, Hartford, CT, Patrick J. Coyne, J. Douglas Baldridge, Collier, Shannon, Rill & Scott, Washington, DC, Ronald B. Coolley, Arnold, White & Durkee, Chicago, IL, for Tenneco Packaging, Inc.


CLAIMS INTERPRETATION IN RE: '659 PATENT

COVELLO, District Judge.

This is an action for damages, declaratory and injunctive relief. It concerns the validity and alleged infringement of a patent. The parties now move to ascertain an interpretation of the "shoulder structure" as used in U.S. Patent No. 5,046,659 ("'659 patent"), by the court pursuant to the holding in Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 U.S. 370

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases