1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 89 N.Y.2d
  5. 89 N.Y.2d 966 (1997)
 

TUESCA v. RANDO MACH. CORP.

89 N.Y.2d 966 (1997)

678 N.E.2d 497

655 N.Y.S.2d 884

Cesar Tuesca, Respondent, v. Rando Machine Corp., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, et al., Defendant. American White Cross Laboratories, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided February 13, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fiedelman & Hoefling, Jericho (William D. Buckley of counsel), for Rando Machine Corp., defendant and third-party plaintiff-appellant.

Quirk & Bakalor, P. C., New York City (Richard H. Bakalor of counsel), for American White Cross Laboratories, third-party defendant-appellant.

Rosenberg, Minc & Armstrong, New York City (Steven C. Falkoff of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges TITONE, BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK and WESLEY.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (226 A.D.2d 157

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases