In seeking to annul the administrative determination finding him guilty of assault, harassment and making threats, petitioner initially argues that he was improperly denied his right to call a certain inmate as a witness. Having acquiesced to the inmate's refusal to testify, however, petitioner waived his right to judicial review of this issue (see, Matter of Reynoso v Le Fevre,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF McKINLEY v. STINSON
237 A.D.2d 815 (1997)
655 N.Y.S.2d 669
In the Matter of Sincere McKinley, Petitioner, v. James Stinson, as Superintendent of Great Meadow Facility, et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 20, 1997
March 20, 1997
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
