1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 130 F.3d
  5. 130 F.3d 892 (1997)
 

NAAS v. STOLMAN

No. 96-16789.

130 F.3d 892 (1997)

Richard E. NAAS; Janet Naas, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Marc D. STOLMAN; David Adrian; National Business Factors Inc., a corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided December 9, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maxim N. Bach, Oroville, California, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Mark E. Ellis and Gregory W. McCracken, Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney, Sacramento, California, for defendants-appellees Marc D. Stolman and National Business Factors.

Charles A. Tweedy, Parshall & Tweedy, Gold River, California, for defendant-appellee David L. Adrian.

Before: HUG, Chief Judge, WALLACE and HALL, Circuit Judges.

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

Richard and Janet Naas sued National Business Factors, Inc. and its attorneys, Adrian and Stolman, (collectively NBF) for violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Act), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692a-1692o, and for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The district court exercised jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(d), and 28 U.S.C. § 1367, and dismissed the Naases' complaint without...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases