U.S. v. FONSECA-CARO

No. 95-16649.

114 F.3d 906 (1997)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernesto Manuel FONSECA-CARO, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided June 5, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth G. Parker, O'Melveny & Myers, Newport Beach, California, for defendant-appellant.

Robert L. Miskell and James D. Whitney, Assistant United States Attorneys, Tucson, Arizona, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before: BROWNING, and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges and RESTANI, Judge.


OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Ernesto Manuel Fonseca-Caro appeals the denial of his second motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We affirm.1

Fonseca-Caro was found guilty under a Pinkerton instruction of violating 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) based solely upon the use and carrying of a gun by a co-conspirator. Under Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640, 647-48, 66 S.Ct. 1180...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases