KRICK v. FLUOR DANIEL, INC.


236 A.D.2d 783 (1997)

653 N.Y.S.2d 886

Robert J. Krick, by Carol Krick, as Guardian ad Litem, et al., Appellants, v. Fluor Daniel, Inc., et al., Respondents Stamco Division of Monarch Machine Tool Co., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Alcan Rolled Products Company et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

February 7, 1997


Order affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Even assuming, arguendo, that Robert J. Krick was engaged in a protected activity when he was injured (see, Holka v Mt. Mercy Academy, 221 A.D.2d 949, lv dismissed 87 N.Y.2d 1055), the complaint was properly dismissed. Because defendant Fluor Daniel, Inc. (Fluor Daniel), had no authority to supervise and control the work being performed by Krick, it is not liable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases