GEER v. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMIN.

Civil Action Nos. 95-10147-DPW, 95-10500-DPW.

975 F.Supp. 39 (1997)

Daniel E. GEER, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants. CITY OF CAMBRIDGE, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

August 4, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond Miyares, Thomas J. Harrington, Pickett & Miyares, Boston, MA, for Daniel E. Geer, Jr., Andreas Aeppli, Robert L. Bencher, Robin Bencher, Mark Browne, Mary Ellen Coyle Browne, Catherine A. Burke, David P. Burns, Renee Diprima Burns, William Cavellini, Katherine J. Coffey, Vincent Lawrence Dixon, Astrid A. Dodds, Douglas W. Dodds, Jr., R. Philip Dowds, K. Dun Gifford, Mark H. Jenkins, Dean R. Johnson, Joseph Joseph, Rosemary A. Keverek, Daniel T. King, Elaine Kistiakowsky, Catherine A. Lewis, Anne R. Lindsay, Louise Lewis, Henry Lukas, John W. MacDonald, Donald Maciver, George McCray, Debra McManus, Peter Murtha, Frederick C. Reece, S. Rivitz, Peter W. Roudebush, Rose Marie A. Ruggerio, Hugo Salemme, Phillip Sego, Bette L. Task, Anne Rawlings Toop, Joanne J. Turnbull, T. Underwood, Richard J. Vendetti, Melinda L Walch, Cambridge Citizens for Liveable Neighborhoods, Inc., Charles River Watershed, Association, Committee for Regional Transportation, Priscilla McMillan.

Edward F. Lawson, Weston, Patrick, Willard & Redding, Boston, MA, for City of Cambridge.

George B. Henderson, United States Attorney's Office, Boston, MA, Phyllis N. Crockett, Attorney General's Office, Boston, MA, Pierce O. Cray, Attorney General's Office, Boston, MA, for Federal Highway Administration, Rodney E. Slater, Stephen A. Moreno, Massachusetts Highway Department, Laurinda T. Bedingfiled.

Phyllis N. Crockett, Attorney General's Office, Boston, MA, Pierce O. Cray, Attorney General's Office, Boston, MA, for Donald Hammer, William Weld, James J. Kerasiotes, Dept. of Metropolitan Dist. Commission, David Balfour.


MEMORANDUM REGARDING MOTIONS TO CONSIDER ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

WOODLOCK, District Judge.

In connection with the summary judgment motions submitted by the parties in these consolidated actions, the City of Cambridge has filed two motions requesting consideration of additional evidence not part of the administrative record filed by the defendants. The defendants oppose consideration of certain of this material...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases