1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 973 F.Supp.
  5. 973 F.Supp. 39 (1997)
 

BIOGEN, INC. v. AMGEN, INC.

Civil Action No. 95-10496-RGS.

973 F.Supp. 39 (1997)

BIOGEN, INC., v. AMGEN, INC.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

July 7, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Sylvia, Patrick T. Clendenen, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky & Popeo, P.C., Boston, MA, James F. Haley, Kenneth B. Herman, Andrew S. Marks, Madge R. Kanter, Jane A. Massaro, Janis P. McLaughlin, Kathleen M. Walker, Fish & Neave, New York City, for Biogen, Inc.

Paul F. Ware, Eileen M. Herlihy, Goodwin, Procter & Hoar, Boston, MA, Karen J. Kramer, Lloyd R. Day, Jr., David M. Madrid, Robert M. Galvin, Ricardo Rodriguez, Gary H. Ritchey, Darren B. Mitchell, Karen A. Gibbs, Cooley Godward LLP, Palo Alto, CA, Steven M. Odre, Karol M. Pessin, Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, Vernon M. Winters, Cooley Godward LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Amgen, Inc.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON AMGEN'S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OF CLAIM 9 OF THE `702 PATENT

STEARNS, District Judge.

Biogen brought suit alleging among other wrongs that Amgen's product Neupogen® infringes claim 9 of U.S. Patent 4,874,702 (the "`702 patent").1 Amgen struck back with a counterclaim attacking the validity of claim 9. See 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). Amgen maintains that an abstract published by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases