HARTLEY v. WISCONSIN BELL, INC.

No. 96-2607.

124 F.3d 887 (1997)

Carole M. HARTLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WISCONSIN BELL, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided September 5, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Campion Kersten (argued), Kersten & McKinnon, Milwaukee, WI, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Deborah Gage Haude, William G. Miossi, Winston & Strawn, Chicago, IL, Bernard J. Bobber, Foley & Lardner, Milwaukee, WI, Stephen J. Liccione (argued), Wisconsin Bell Inc., Milwaukee, WI, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before POSNER, Chief Judge, and BAUER and MANION, Circuit Judges.


MANION, Circuit Judge.

Carole Hartley was 51 years old when she lost her job as a middle manager at Wisconsin Bell after the phone company underwent a major organizational restructuring. She sued under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., claiming that Bell fired her and retained two other managers, who were no more than seven years younger than she, on account of her age. The district court granted summary judgment to Bell after...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases