HOLT v. CITY OF SAUK RAPIDS

No. C5-96-1935.

559 N.W.2d 444 (1997)

Mary Pallansch HOLT, et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF SAUK RAPIDS, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied April 24, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marshall H. Tanick, Teresa J. Ayling, Mansfield & Tanick, P.A., Minneapolis, for Appellants.

Pierre N. Regnier, Cara J. Debes, Jardine, Logan & O'Brien, P.L.L.P., St. Paul, for Respondents.

Carla J. Heyl, John C. Keller, League of Minnesota Cities, St. Paul, Amicus Curiae.

Considered and decided by NORTON, P.J., and HUSPENI and FOLEY,, JJ.


OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellants, both dog owners, seek reversal of the district court's denial of their request for attorney fees after the court declared unconstitutional respondent municipality's ordinances limiting the number of dogs per residential unit. Respondent seeks review of the judgment of unconstitutionality. Because we conclude that the ordinances are reasonably related to the public's health, safety, and welfare, we reverse the summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases