1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 569 N.W.2d
  5. 569 N.W.2d 433 (1997)
 

STATE v. BRADY

No. C9-97-264.

569 N.W.2d 433 (1997)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Robert William BRADY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

October 14, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Attorney General, St. Paul, and Robert M.A. Johnson, Anoka County Attorney, M. Katherine Doty, Anoka County Attorney's Office, Anoka, for Respondent.

Michael F. Cromett, St. Paul, and Mark G. Giancola, Anoka, for Appellant.

Considered and decided by KLAPHAKE, P.J., and DAVIES and PETERSON, JJ.

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Appellant Robert William Brady was charged with fifth-degree controlled substance crime after police seized marijuana and other items from his townhouse and another residence. Following an omnibus hearing, the trial court declined to suppress the evidence. Appellant waived his right to a jury trial, submitted the case on stipulated facts, and now appeals from his conviction. We reverse.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases